Welcome to The Cahokian... A thousand years ago Cahokia — across the Mississippi from what is now St. Louis — was one of the biggest cities in the world. Now it's an empty green spot next to the highway. I'm a middle-aged gay man living in New York City, center of the world, future footnote on somebody's future map. Welcome to the new world.
Saturday, October 09, 2010
Anti-American Art: Collateral Damage
This sheetlet of 16 stamps was issued by Libya -- the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya -- in 1986 to mark the attack earlier that year ordered by U.S. President Reagan against targets in Tripoli and Benghazi. The joined vignettes focus on the toll among Libyan civilians, including, apparently, many children. While dead children are a bonafide propaganda cliche, it is quite remarkable how frequently these tiniest collateral targets get in the way of American (and Israeli) bombs. The presence of enemy tots seems never to have deterred American imperial interests, whether in Libya in 1986 or the Afghan-Pakistan border in 2010. No wonder that world opinion of the U.S. is a complicated matter.
Other gory Libyan stamps marking the U.S. attack of 1986 can be seen here.
Update: I just read the late Howard Zinn's excellent article on the U.S. attack on Libya "Terrorism Over Tripoli." He puts it in excellent perspective: "Even if we assume that Khadafi was behind the discotheque bombing (and there is no evidence for this), and Reagan behind the Tripoli bombing (the evidence for this is absolute), then both are terrorists, but Reagan is capable of killing far more people than Khadafi. And he has.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
it is quite remarkable how frequently
ReplyDeletethese tiniest collateral targets get
in the way of American (and Israeli)
bombs.
-------------------------------
Generaly speaking here--
These targets are used as shields
for a base of operations. Its a strategy. I can't justify how
either side is waging war, though
history (with a few exceptions)
shows this to be imperialist
aggression by the US and Israel.
I'm not sure I believe that anybody is using civilians as shields exactly...except that nobody goes out to fight a war on a battlefield anymore which means, of course, everywhere is a battlefield. Maybe Waterloo and Agincourt were somehow less barbaric? Or maybe it's all a horrorshow.
ReplyDelete